Organize activity data
Keep the source, period and activity quantity together so the record has a clear context.
CAPYG · CARBON INTELLIGENCE
CapyG helps industrial organizations organize operational carbon data, evidence and reporting workflows in one place.
01 / The operational problem
Energy bills, fuel records and supporting files often arrive from different people. Factory carbon reporting needs a traceable path from activity to evidence and review, so a management number can be explained.
02 / What the user sees

Keep the source, period and activity quantity together so the record has a clear context.
Link supporting evidence to activity records and see its review status.
Retain emission-factor context with the activity so reviewers can understand how a value was derived.
Use evidence status and the audit trail to structure the next review conversation.
Give management a view of the records and gaps that need attention before reporting.
03 / The role of AI
The intended AI role is to help make evidence and data gaps understandable for human review. The brief below illustrates that role; it is not a verified live AI feature or an assurance opinion. Current demonstrated value is in activity records, linked evidence and traceability.
AI does not certify emissions, approve methodology or replace a qualified reviewer. This page does not promise regulatory submission, certification, or an automatically generated compliant report. Report formats and any AI-assisted review are confirmed in the product walkthrough.
04 / Fit with existing systems
Start with existing activity records and supporting documents. Agree the organizational boundary, reporting period, units, data owners and review responsibilities. Assess each required data connection separately; no universal ERP, meter or regulatory integration is assumed.
05 / Implementation
Define the factory boundary, period and reporting use case.
Identify activity records, evidence sources and data owners.
Agree activity categories, factor context and review responsibilities.
Review records and evidence gaps before preparing reporting outputs.
Scope and implementation plans depend on data, existing systems and team readiness, and are agreed after discovery.
For factory sustainability teams, data owners and managers who need to collect activity records, review evidence and understand reporting readiness.
Bring one reporting period, the activity sources you collect and an example of how evidence is reviewed today.
Start with existing activity records and supporting documents. Agree the organizational boundary, reporting period, units, data owners and review responsibilities. Assess each required data connection separately; no universal ERP, meter or regulatory integration is assumed.
AI does not certify emissions, approve methodology or replace a qualified reviewer. This page does not promise regulatory submission, certification, or an automatically generated compliant report. Report formats and any AI-assisted review are confirmed in the product walkthrough.
06 / Your next step
Bring one reporting period, the activity sources you collect and an example of how evidence is reviewed today.
Opens an email draft. Nothing is sent until you send it.